Fw: Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis. [feedly]

25. August 2015
 
Gruß

Kai Müller

 

 

Betreff: Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis. [feedly]
 

 

 

—-
Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
// pubmed: systematic[sb] AND (dental implants ("Dental Prosthesis Design" OR prosthesis planning))

Related Articles

Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 May;25(5):539-45

Authors: Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, Moraguez O, Bernard JP, Belser UC

Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to test the hypothesis that 6 mm micro-rough short Straumann(®) implants provide predictable survival rates and verify that most failures occurring are early failures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed and hand search was performed to identify studies involving micro-rough 6-mm-short implants published between January 1987 and August 2011. Studies were included that (i) involve Straumann(®) 6 mm implants placed in the human jaws, (ii) provide data on the survival rate, (iii) mention the time of failure, and (iv) report a minimum follow-up period of 12 months following placement. A meta-analysis was performed on the extracted data.
RESULTS: From a total of 842 publications that were screened, 12 methodologically sound articles qualified to be included for the statistical evaluation based on our inclusion criteria. A total of 690 Straumann(®) 6-mm-short implants were evaluated in the reviewed studies (Total: placed-690, failed-25; maxilla: placed-266, failed-14; mandible: placed-364, failed-5; follow-up period: 1-8 years). A meta-analysis was performed on the calculated early cumulative survival rates (CSR%). The pooled early CSR% calculated in this meta-analysis was 93.7%, whereas the overall survival rates in the maxilla and mandible were 94.7% and 98.6% respectively. Implant failures observed were predominantly early failures (76%).
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence that micro-rough 6-mm-short dental implants are a predictable treatment option, providing favorable survival rates. The failures encountered with 6-mm-short implants were predominantly early and their survival in the mandible was slightly superior.

PMID: 23413956 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

—-

 

__,_._,___

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort